On 06/06/11 14:52, Maarten Deen wrote: > > But the current action is: "accept or lose the ability to map". That is > close to coercion and not a valid base to claim that 2/3's agree to this.
It is not anywhere near coercion. OSM is not the state, and you can map wherever else you like. - Rob.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
