Thanks, Henk!
Kirill
On 07.06.2011 4:37, Henk Hoff wrote:
Hi Kirill,
If you want to clarify "as deep as possible" you might also want to
check with OpenDataCommons (ODC), the authors of the license.
Their mailinglist can be found here:
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/odc-discuss
cheers,
Henk
Op 06-06-11 13:46, Kirill Bestoujev schreef:
Frederik, thanks for the reply.
Do we have somewhere a more detailed description of collective
database relating to OSM situation? May be some lawyers opinion or
something else? Previously we were looking at the situation in a
different way and suddenly understood that our positions is not very
clear, so we would like to clarify the situation as deep as possible.
Kirill
On 06.06.2011 15:40, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 06/06/11 12:56, Kirill Bestoujev wrote:
The resulting map (a single file) contains data from both
sources. Can this resulting map (which is a database by its inside
structure) treated as a collective database?
I believe so. In my opinion, a derived database would result if you
were to mix other data with OSM data in a way that actually looks at
the OSM data - for example, if you have an OSM database of streets,
and then add to that streets from another dataset but only where OSM
had nothing. That would be a derived database. But if you have two
datasets that live side-by-side in the same physical database, I
would say that is a collective database.
Bye
Frederik
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
