On 1 September 2011 18:25, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > Obviously I would clearly prefer that the mappers in question simply > discover some pragmatism and get over any issues they may have with the > OSMF.
That's an interesting spin on things, wouldn't the pragmatic approach be for OSM-F to work with CC to come up with a CC-by-SA license that is deemed more suitable? Not that I see anything wrong with the current license, in fact the whole exercise seems like a knee jerk reaction because some think something "must be done". _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk