Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > In order to preserve anonymity while still allowing them to be taken through > into the new database, LWG has provided a list of the changesets edited by > anonymous-but-accepting-CTs mappers. This is available on planet.osm.org and > will be refreshed periodically. I believe both Frederik and Simon are using > it for their visualisation/tally services.
OK, thanks to clarify thing. But the nodes i'm talking about are indicate in geofabrick tool "subhect to licence trouble" and i a explorer history for some nodes all users envolve have accepted CTs, except for the first one that has no user in history (i assume it was anonymous). One node history : <http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/21462322/history> The area in geofabrick (nodes on the motorway) <http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-0.55431&lat=45.75814&zoo m=11&overlays=overview,wtfe_point_harmless,wtfe_line_harmless,wtfe_point _modified,wtfe_line_modified_cp,wtfe_line_modified,wtfe_point_created,wt fe_line_created_cp,wtfe_line_created> Perhaps there is no problems, but i'm worry. -- Pierre-Alain Dorange OSM experiences : <http://www.leretourdelautruche.com/map/> _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk