Am 6. März 2012 17:52 schrieb Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org>: > On 03/06/2012 02:36 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: >> Personally, I don't think that *verifying* their data against OSM data >> (in the sense of flagging potential problems, as long as they don't copy >> our data outright) would be a valid use of our data that would not >> create a "derived database". (The database that contains the results of >> the analysis might be derived and have to released.) > > > Oops. Tripped over my own negative here. I wanted to say: As long as they > just compare stuff and verify, I think it's ok and they won't be affected by > viral ODbL-ness.
Really? So also this sentence was not intended and you mean the opposite: "(The database that contains the results of the analysis might be derived and have to released.)"? Isn't this a kind of merge: "just compare and verify" (above there was also "flagging")? cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
