Three different examples; all of them were remapped & verified in respect to location and tags (except of name=* in most cases). That doesn't mean the tags have changed though, sometimes they were imported just right.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28099536/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28099539/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28099452/history Could you point me to the v0 rule you're referring to? Cheers, rhn > If you essentially remapped the objects it may be that some or most of > your data would be safe due to the v0 rule (regardless of any other > developments wrt UMP). It is difficult to answer this more definitely > we would need to see some examples. > > Simon > > Am 28.03.2012 22:12, schrieb rhn: > > Hello, > > > > Please excuse me if my question has been asked before, I don't follow this > > list. > > > > Today I found information about the way data is going to be marked as > > incompatible - the way I understood it, all ways and nodes are going to be > > reverted to the latest compatible version (i.e. the one before first > > CC-only changeset). > > > > This worries me, as it seems the bulk of my changesets will be deleted. > > I focused on an area with data coming nearly exclusively from an > > incompatible source (UMP). Before a license change was even in plans, I > > managed to replace the road network almost completely with GPS traces and > > some landuse data with WMS and traces. > > The problem is, I never bothered too much with replacing the actual > > database objects (takes too much time), thinking removal of source=* would > > be enough. Let me mention that I removed source only from nodes and ways > > that I had precise data about (and would have deleted if it wasn't a > > hassle). > > > > My questions are: Is it acceptable to copy the snapshot of my current data > > that would otherwise get deleted and restore it as CT-compatible? > > If yes, should the backup be performed now or is there going to be a way to > > access CC data after the license change? > > If not, is there any other way to preserve the data? > > > > Cheers, > > rhn > > > > _______________________________________________ > > legal-talk mailing list > > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
