On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz> wrote: > Hi! > > So lets start by saying that I don't like ODbL and I hate CT. > > There are three classes of data I uploaded to osm: > > a) Hand created data, most important paths in the woods. CT+ODbL, is > okay for those. > > b) ODbL compatible - mass imports. CT+ODbL is okay for those, provided > data from a) are kept. Richard convinced me that CT is not meant to be > evil, and I can live with that. > > c) ODbL incompatible mass imports. Obviously these need to be > removed. I have no power to change this. Mass imports were cities > from wikipedia (place=*) and railway stations from around > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/188101 > 187327 > > I hope this helps, and I'd like to see some reply, thanks,
Dear Pavel, I'll ask the LWG chair to add this matter to the discussion at the next LWG meeting. I expect that LWG will send you a formal reply. Until then, I'd like to thank you personally for granting permission for some of your contributions to continue as CT/ODbL, even with your stated disagreements with some aspects of ODbL and of CTs. Thank you also, to the other members of the OSM community who have been discussing the matter with you. Best regards, Richard _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk