Hi Pekka, I'm concerned specifically about the specifics of the licensing so I can speak to them, not the ideal situation. Yes when I present I do approach with explaining it is best if everyone contributes to the same map.
I still need to know the specifics of the constraints of the license, since I often get asked questions. -Kate On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Pekka Sarkola <pekka.sark...@gispo.fi> wrote: > Kate, > > Can you reverse this: how about if NMA will improve local OSM data and then > MoE will use OpenStreetMap. Benefits for all, right? > > That is how we try to make it here in Finland. Well, National Land Survey of > Finland is not improving OSM, but we (as OSMers) can improve OSM with their > data. > > Rgs, > > Pekka > > ---- Pekka Sarkola – pekka.sark...@gispo.fi – www.gispo.fi ---- > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kate Chapman [mailto:k...@maploser.com] > Sent: 18. kesäkuuta 2012 6:59 > To: Licensing and other legal discussions. > Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Triggering ShareAlike in Government > > Hi All, > > I have a question about what would trigger the ShareAlike in the context of > government. Let's say for example a National Mapping Agency takes the > OpenStreetMap road data for their area and then improves upon it. Those > improvements are shared with the Ministry of the Environment. Is that > redistribution? > > Thanks, > > -Kate > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk