Am 17.07.2012 13:01, schrieb fk270...@fantasymail.de: > The detrimental license bot now has reached Germany and promptly left a lot > of errors here. > > Let's just look at one city, Göttingen in Northern Germany, where I have > contacted some undecided users, so I have some knowledge about pre-bot > history. > > There are so many errors with severe legal implications, Ok... lets see:
> so I would like to publish them on the legal-talk list. Their manipulated > history is such a heavy infringement of Creative Commons license that even an > agreer could easily sue the OSMF if he was willing to waste time and money on > a senseless trial. Let me show the examples: > > - agreeing mapper's node disappeared > http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=60580009 No legal implication. > > Version 3 of this node (51.5400973, 9.9564636) was last edited by agreeing > user Sasude. By removing this precisely located node, an intersection of four > streets was destroyed. > > - street has disappeared completely > > The southern part of Dahlmannstraße with bus route No. 6 has disappeared > completely though it was last edited by agreers. > > - intersections were cut off > - ODbL history ignores agreeing users > http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=8091768 No legal implication. > > Both intersections were cut off though these nodes were last edited by an > agreer. > Undediced mapper Hotte Degoe has created an empty line without any tags. All > tags were added by agreeing users, all points have been moved by agreeing > users as well. > Only v1 should be hidden, all other versions by agreeing mappers should be > visible. No legal implication. > - decliner included in ODbL history > http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=60922724 > > Lobelt has declined the new contributor terms so far mainly for political > reasons, but he still appears in the "clean" ODbL history because he has > removed a senseless tag. Removing a tag does not constitute a copyright, but > mentioning him in the history is an infringement of moral rights. > v2 should be hidden. Why would -mentioning- him be an infringement of moral rights, if at all it would be the other way around. No legal implication. > - OSMF Redaction Account claims to be the only author > http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=8573909 > > Since the OSMF Redaction Account did not create any way, he cannot pretend to > be the author of any way. This pretense is illegal according to Creative > Commons and rude though legal according to new ODbL license. > At least some human users should appear in the history. > > - ODbL history ignores too many agreeing users (2nd example) > http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=8094092 > Undediced mapper Hotte Degoe has created an empty line without any tags. All > tags were added by agreeing users, all points have been moved by agreeing > users as well. > Only v1 should be hidden, all other versions by agreeing mappers should be > visible. Currently edits by agreeing users that would expose material by a non-agreeing user are not displayed by the API/GUI. All users that have agreed to the CTs have agreed to "bulk" attribution, no material from non-agreeing users has been used (exception trivial edits that are attributed as you note). No legal implication. > > These seven examples are quite simple cases without any complications. I am > sure that some of you will be able to find many more examples where the bot > has made severe errors. Well up to now you have not found a single case with an "error"...... Simon _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
