Igor Brejc wrote: > 4.3 Notice for using output (Contents). Creating and Using a > Produced Work does not require the notice in Section 4.2. However, if > you Publicly Use a Produced Work, You must include a notice > associated with the Produced Work reasonably calculated to make any > Person that uses, views, accesses, interacts with, or is otherwise > exposed to the Produced Work aware that *Content* was obtained from > the Database, Derivative Database, or the Database as part of a > Collective Database, *and that it is available under this License*.
The "it" in this sentence refers to "Content" (i.e. the extract from the ODbL-licensed Database) rather than the Produced Work as a whole. Produced Works do not have to be licensed under a share-alike licence. Attribution is required, as per the above clause. My view is that this implies a downstream attribution requirement too ("reasonably calculated to make any Person... exposed to the Produced Work") - besides, in practice, why wouldn't you want to? - but I think Robert disagrees with me on this. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Licenses-for-Produced-Works-under-ODbL-tp5732278p5732291.html Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk