> From: Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com] > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] RFC - OSM contributor mark > > My initial writeup could have been clearer: This RFC _does_ seek to > replace the currently recommended line "(c) OpenStreetMap contributors" > linking to http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright with a visual mark > linking to a future http://openstreetmap.org/contributors. Examples of > the visual mark can be found on > http://yhahn.github.com/byosm/examples.html and the suggested > /contributors page can be found at http://yhahn.github.com/byosm. > osm.org/copyright would be linked from osm.org/contributors in the > future, more below.
I question if the hammer is a "notice ... reasonably calculated to make any Person ... aware that the Content was obtained from the Database ... and that it is available under [ODbL]". The example notice for satisfying 4.3 is "Contains information from DATABASE NAME, wich is made available here under the Open Database License (ODbL)" I've cc'ed legal-talk@ because if this is even allowable is a legal question. Regardless I'm not in favour. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk