Sorry for missing the meeting got my times confused, It is a definite yes from me. There is a "term" in singular that should be plural I believe. But otherwise completely ok with me.
Simon Am 09.07.2013 20:38, schrieb Michael Collinson: > Simon, > > Oliver, Dermot and I have give a finally look over the document and > are happy to now send it to the board as our formal proposal. However, > as Chair I would really prefer a formal quorate, 4, for such things > and ask you to indicate yes or no by email before I send it. > > https://docs.google.com/a/osmfoundation.org/document/d/1uQ0hpkFxqdNf7aPMk_5PaHFZojxULMcWXxLJRbYq4oE/edit > > The draft is of the last meeting + your changes + we went through and > considered and clarified what each "OpenStreetMap" meant. As an > interesting aside, it defines "OpenStreetMap" without qualification to > be the database itself rather than any human entity ... may be a > useful legal construct in the future. > > I also intend forwarding it to the Japanese community since treatment > of disputed-island naming is an issue there as it ties the hands of > the national mapping agency on how cooperative they can be with us. If > I get any substantial feedback, I will forward to board. > > Mike
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
