> > > or giving data back when you fix things. > This is a gross oversimplification of share-alike. And the imperfections in the license extend beyond geocoding. I don't want to rehash the arguments, as Alex Barth did <http://stateofthemap.us/session/more-open/> very eloquently at State of the Map US. Let's just not pretend the requirements are "simple", "tiny", or "little", but are instead complex and sweeping.
In any case, I agree with the larger point that OSM data users must comply with the rules as they exist and we should publicly call out their violations. -Jake
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
