Thanks for clarifying, I glossed over the implications of the attribution requirement a little too easily. -- Martijn
On 8/8/14, 2:48 AM, "Simon Poole" <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > > >Am 05.08.2014 20:25, schrieb Martijn van Exel: >... >> >> Note that YouTube users can also choose a CC-BY license - which should >> be compatible with ODbL. But the default is the Standard YouTube License >> outlined above. >... >CC-BY is not per se compatible. We need (and I believe this is still the >case with 4.0) explicit acknowledgement that the way that we provide >attribution is OK and that we do not provide downstream attribution for >individual sources. In the past it has been reasonably easy to get that >from institutional sources, but it does imply adding the source to our >contributors list etc. something that we would likely want to avoid in >the 1000s. > >Simon > _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
