Am 13.05.2015 um 22:00 schrieb Tom Lee: .. > > Nope. I was referring to collective databases in the ODbL which are > roughly the equivalent of collective works in early versions of CC > licenses and only require the OSM derived part to be subject to the ODbL > terms. > > > This is the part I think I could use help understanding. My impression > is that a collective database can contain ODbL and non-ODbL content > side-by-side. Are you saying that CC-BY 4.0 makes this impossible > because its attribution requirements would attach to the non-ODbL > content as well? --
Roughly yes. Though my concern is not mainly about the requirement itself, it is simply that the concept of a collective database seems to be incompatible with the current text of CC by 4.0. Now I know how I would weasel myself out of this if I was CC, but I'm not, so lets see what they say. Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
