Andrew, I am not a member of the LWG, but insofar as: - questions regarding CC-BY 3.0's compatibility with ODbL hinge on the impracticality of downstream compliance with the license's attribution requirements in a geo context - the rightsholder has made it clear that they understand downstream attribution requirements to be unreasonable in many cases, and don't believe the obligation should apply in those cases - the rightsholder has made it clear what attribution they wish to receive, and it's obviously within OSM's power to comply with those wishes
I think this looks like a pretty good chance to incorporate some valuable open data. On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote: > We've received some correspondence from a state government department > regarding the use of their CC BY 3.0 AU licensed data and imagery > within OpenStreetMap. > > One OSM member initially received the response: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/New_South_Wales_Government_Data#Cleary.27s_Letter > > I then followed up about some ambiguous sections of the text and > received this response: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/New_South_Wales_Government_Data#Andrew.27s_Letter > > Would this be sufficiently legally binding and legally solid to allow > us to include their CC BY 3.0 AU licensed data, derivative data and > information derived from their imagery within OSM? > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
