Hi, there was discussion regarding storing 'substantial' OSM data and also related to geocoding. Are the following guidelines the latest effort or is this still a work in progress or needs still approval somehow from the community? https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Community_Guidelines/Substantial_-_Guideline https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Geocoding_-_Guideline
When I apply this to a use case of my customers of potentially caching geocoding or route results I can conclude that this is possible when attributing OSM plus: * either keep the cache smaller than 100 entries or * keep the results in a separate 'database' (e.g. used for caching) which is then 100% ODbL but would not influence the other data Is this correct? Now assume I would like to avoid that the ODbL kicks in even if I have more than 100 or even several thousands cached entries. Would that be possible when the cache stores results only for 2 or 3 weeks maximum and is just for the purpose of reducing request counts and increased performance? Kind Regards, Peter
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk