It's quite simple: as long as MAPS.ME operates in either the white or the grey area of the license it's perfectly fine what they are doing.
Op 22 jul. 2016 12:04 p.m. schreef "Richard Fairhurst" <rich...@systemed.net >: > Ilya Zverev wrote: > > Let's consider another use case. An application that shows OSM map, > > and on top of it shows 1 mln of user points. A users has an option to > > hide the OSM map underneath proprietary points, with a radius of 1 > > km. Does in that moment when a user clickes the options, the > > combined map become derivative? > > The question then would be how ODbL treats a machine-generated result like > that, where both independent datasets are transmitted to the device but the > selection/arrangement of the "combined" result is done algorithmically > on-device. > > That probably depends on your reading of the terms "Convey", "Use" and > "Publicly" in ODbL; I confess to not being 100% sure how they would apply > in > such a case, and would be interested to hear others' opinions. > > Richard > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-MAPS-ME-combining-OSM-data-and-non-OSM-data-tp5877650p5878889.html > Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
