On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:11:04 +0200 (CEST), Enrico wrote in message <[email protected]>:
> First of all - I would like to thank you all so much for your help, > patience, time and passion. > Thank you a lot Neil - and don't worry - I understand perfectly that > you're doing this at your personal title, and for me, this is a > beautiful thing! I appreciate it a lot - and more than if you where > talking aas a Vodafone Spokesman. > > I decided to write this new message from scratch, since I don't like > so much lines like > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <some text> > .. sorry! :) > For me, the idea of analysing the software a little more is a very > very good idea - and I've been doing so last night, even if I haven't > hear nothing from the user who had the device. > I can already tell you that: > - the release is an OpenWrt Kamikaze (as already said) > - the are some firmware blobs probably related to LTE hardware and/or > DSL one, and those are not covered by the GPL, so they're out ..easy now, shouldn't these binary blobs be identified by name, size, date, checksum(s), copyright ownership, copyright license and file owners statement on file purpose, so a judge "can judge for himself"? > - in many boot scripts, there are references to a company - "Vertical > Communications": no homepage, only the "2010" date > > Then, the usual set of scripts and binaries that are not pertaining > to OpenWrt itself directly, but have no Copyright notices. > We don't have the U-Boot Boot Loader as now - and I honestly don't > remember what's the U-Boot License. It seems to me very likely a > Lantiq-patched U-Boot. In the firmware you can see lots of traces of > Lantiq technology, including some blobs firmware. > > Thank you again for your support. > > Enrico M. > > > -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.
