On 07/08/13 15:38, Eric D wrote:
In regards to Jeremy's statement below in regards to the GPL, and how
XDA enforces the GPL, I would like to provide some more facts in regards
to this.
Their forums, their list, complain over there.
showp1984 is exempt from providing a
defconfig file (per broncogr).
And before we spew falsities around, haven't we allready agreed, that if
/proc/config.gz is enabled in the kernel, you can extract it from it
(running kernel or from the file itself) and thus the config file is
distributed. Awkward and less user friendly, but far far from a
violation? Just a reminder in case you had forgotten.
...and.....
MikeC84 clearly responded to a request for source with "with I post a
link, you can have it" You would have to be blind to realize that at
the time of the request, he had no intent of providing source code. He
only covered his tracks after his compliance issues were discussed here.
And hopefully he learned his lesson.
Oliver
