On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Ian Stirling <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04.08.2013 17:40, Joseph Heenan wrote: > >> Still, albeit probably not violating the GPL, removing the original >> copyright statements does feel very wrong, but I have no idea what law >> if any it violates. >> >> Joseph > > > As I understand it - it means your code isn't licensed. (GPLV2)
question: how can more details be learned about what code has been criminally infringed, and how can a case be brought against goldman sachs for criminal copyright infringment and violation of the GPL? l.
