On 9 Aug 2013, at 18:50, Arnt Karlsen <[email protected]> wrote: Evening, Arnt
> ..I see no difference selling brand new and 2'nd hand stuff > under the GPLv2 My interpretation would be that, in a second hand sale of a piece of hardware with embedded software, the act of resale does not constitute an act restricted by copyright, and so there is no need for a licence, so whatever the GPL might, or might not, say is immaterial. The GPL, as you say, does not make such a distinction, but I don't think it needs to: this is an issue of copyright law, and whether a licence is required, rather than a term of the licence itself. Neil __________ Neil Brown [email protected] | http://neilzone.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
