On 10 Aug 2013, at 02:31, Jerome Leclanche <[email protected]> wrote:
> What are the implications of GPL-licensed code being used in a purely > cosmetic way in commercial products (such as hollywoodish hacking scenes)? None at all, that I can think of — the GPL does not impose any conditions on merely running a program, and, in my view, the spirit of the GPL would extend this to running it and filming it being run. There is not act of distribution or conveyance here. It might be quite good publicity, though? Neil __________ Neil Brown [email protected] | http://neilzone.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
