On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:51:14 +0100, Neil wrote in message <[email protected]>:
> > On 25 Oct 2013, at 17:27, Arnt Karlsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > is in the domain of > > criminal law enforcement > > This does, however, bring with it the perhaps challenging hurdle of > needing to find a prosector willing to take the case? ..correct. ;o) > (And, personally, I am not convinced at all that pursuing copyright > infringement as a matter of criminal law would be desirable, even if > it might be something on the statute books.) ..this depends a fair bit on what kinda teeth you want the GPL to have. Much of the over-the-top unfair "Hollywood-n-Microsoft" copyright litigation, has IMNTHO been _intentionally_ over-the-top unfair, precisely to discredit criminal copyright law enforcement, and by that the very teeth of the GPL. ..if we need these teeth, we want them pointy and sharp enough, so they can be useful to us. > > Best wishes, > > > Neil > > __________ > > Neil Brown > [email protected] | http://neilzone.co.uk > > > -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.
