TJ wrote: > I disagree completely - in fact it makes the process much easier for both developers and legal bodies to review.Yeah it is possible to keep the GPL bits separate from the non-GPL bits but whats not possible is to eliminate the lengthy process that has to be undertaken to make sure that whats in the "GPL" or "open source" parts of the tree IS in fact releasable (i.e. the delays many companies seem to have after releasing new firmware before they release the source code)
- Experiences of Huawei providing source-code? TJ
- Re: Experiences of Huawei providing source-code? Anto Cvitić
- 答复: Experiences of Huawei providing source-code? Shenfen (Navia)
- Re: 答复: Experiences of Huawei providing source-co... TJ
- 答复: 答复: Experiences of Huawei providing sourc... Shenfen (Navia)
- Re: 答复: Experiences of Huawei providing sourc... Jonathan Wilson
- Re: 答复: Experiences of Huawei providing s... TJ
- Re: 答复: Experiences of Huawei provid... Solomon Peachy
- Re: 答复: Experiences of Huawei provid... Jonathan Wilson
- Re: 答复: Experiences of Huawei providing s... Solomon Peachy
- Re: 答复: Experiences of Huawei providing s... Robinson Tryon
- Re: Experiences of Huawei^h^h^h^h^h^h *ZYXEL* providi... TJ
- Re: Experiences of ZYXEL providing source-code? TJ
