I think the complete lack of responses to your posts clearly indicates the level of interest the group has in this situation. As has been said time and again, this list is not the GPL police. Please don’t use it that way and spam everyone with this stuff.
-- Ryan Orr [email protected] On Friday, December 6, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Eric D wrote: > UPDATE: > > 5 days later, source still is not uploaded to github. He created a branch in > his repo for the source, but never (at the time of this email) pushed the > changes to his base source. > > He has updated a few other kernels, so uploading should no longer be a > problem. > https://github.com/faux123?tab=activity => his nexus 5 and nexus 7 kernels > have been updated, after his claims of uploading problems. > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Kenny Glass <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > Date: Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:38 AM > Subject: Re: XDA;s faux123 (aka Paul Reioux) violations GPL.. again > To: Eric D <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > > > He was given 5 days as is XDA's generous allotment. He responded immediately > about having upload problems so he is communicating properly. > > We do not control Twitter. I would think asking Twitter to be GPL compliant > will be quite a task for the Linux group. > > > On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Eric D <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > > Update to the faux123 issue. > > > > He "created" a branch in his repo for source, but the source/commits in > > this "branch" are not remotely close to samsung's "MKG" source, they the > > branch is named "KK-MKG", and if you view his "activity" on github, he has > > not pust any commits after creating the branch.. > > > > faux123 (https://github.com/faux123) created branch kk_MKG > > (https://github.com/faux123/jflte_xxx/tree/kk_MKG) at faux123/jflte_xxx > > (https://github.com/faux123/jflte_xxx) > > 7 hours ago > > as viewed at https://github.com/faux123?tab=activity > > > > > > > > the branch was created 7 hours ago as of the time of this email, his kernel > > was posted on twitter 22 hours ago, and he admitted that he posted his > > kernel on xda, while source was still uploading to github. 7 hours later > > - the source isnt uploaded... > > > > as of now, 11/30/2013 - 1147pm CA time, his repo is still not current. > > > > Just a FYI... > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Kenny Glass <[email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > Request to update github was sent. Anyone posting a kernel link on XDA is > > > responsible for also posting source. > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Eric D <[email protected] > > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > > On XDA - faux123 posted that his kernel for the i9505g is "offical" > > > > (see post here => > > > > http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=46788377&postcount=284 ) > > > > directly under that post is a direct download link to the kernel posted > > > > by someone else - but it is hosted on faux123's download server that is > > > > posted in his threads on xda > > > > (see post here ==> > > > > http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=47997446&postcount=285 ) > > > > > > > > per his github site - this kernel hasnt been updated in over 1 month. > > > > 4.4 source that his new kernel is build from has been out for a few > > > > days. > > > > see his github here for the device in question => > > > > https://github.com/faux123/jflte_xxx > > > > > > > > These seem to be a common occurance for "faux123" / Paul Reioux. > > > > > > > > Is Paul "allowed" to violate the GPL over and over and over as so long > > > > as he doesnt post the link himself on xda (but he does post it on > > > > twitter ( https://twitter.com/faux123 ) ), and he has the files hosted > > > > on his server that is available to the general public? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
