Thanks again, Bradley, for taking the time to share your point of view. Regards, Martha Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message----- From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:11:48 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Youtube link; discussion of #FOSS related legal issues. mc.martha wrote on 28 January: > Hi all, Here is a link to a discussion on legal issues related to # > FOSS. ... > http://youtu.be/mN9NbxyzI10 FWIW, I sent Martha some feedback on her CLE class linked to above in private email to her. I suspect that the material is a bit too basic for the folks on this list; most folks on this list probably know all the information presented there (e.g., just the very oversimplified basics of copyright law in the USA and Free Software licenses are presented), and/or it's not relevant to them (e.g., a lot of time is spent on USA corporate form, which is quite tangential to issues of Free Software licenses). Meanwhile, I am loathe to point out publicly, but I think I must since this link was posted publicly on this list, that there are some errors in this discussion, and specifically I'm concerned about errors regarding some details of Conservancy and Andersen vs. Best Buy et al. I suggest anyone who wants details on that case take a look at the docket: http://ia600409.us.archive.org/18/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.355978/gov.uscourts.nysd.355978.docket.html (BTW, I've been trying to fill in that docket slowly with RECAP: https://www.recapthelaw.org/ But PACER charges once you ask for too many documents in a given time period. So, I'd appreciate help from others who have PACER access to install the RECAP plugin as well.) -- -- bkuhn
