Hello,

Please see below ...


On 03/10/2014 10:58 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Olliver Schinagl:
>
>> How long of a delay would be acceptable? This is not a case where one
>> would try to circumvent the release or anything. The intention is to
>> release everything as expected, it is not used as some con to not
>> release things as needed.
> Of course it is.  Why have a legal review if it never can block a
> source release?
>
> As Bruce said, you have to to prepare the source code release as part
> of the release process for the binaries.
>
> There have been cases where the FSF has approved a delay in publishing
> source code. The FSFE has entered a strange licensing deal with Bacula
> Systems.  
The licensing deal with Bacula Systems has nothing directly to do with
delay in publishing source code.  It is perhaps unusual (or strange as
you say), because Bacula Systems holds a dual license to the source code
basically because I am the original author and have FLAs from all the
contributors.  Though there are a number of points, for me, the main
point of the license is that Bacula Systems, because I believe in open
source, agrees to give all code it writes that is not encumbered by 3rd
party proprietary licenses (example Oracle plugin) to the community
within a five year period.  So Bacula Systems though it is an "open
core" company has made a very strong commitment to support the Bacula
community version.  Disclaimer: the FSFE does not encourage the open
core business model. End Disclaimer.  I personally believe that other
open core companies might be willing to make similar agreements, so they
could be encouraged to have a business model that is somewhere between
open source and open core, which could significantly increase the amount
of open source code.

Best regards,
Kern Sibbald
Bacula Project Manager,
CTO Bacula Systems

> But the gist is that you need an additional agreement, there
> is an expectation that you can't do it with the plain GPL (although
> counsel to various companies in the Android sphere thinks it's okay).
>


Reply via email to