Julius Schwartzenberg wrote: > I previously mailed with Armijn about this
Armijn is retired from gpl-violations.org now, so he probably doesn't have too much time to help. http://gpl-violations.org/news/20120805-armijn_retires.html Also, Harald is busy with his other (important) work so he hasn't been working on GPL enforcement for the last few years AFAIK. > A few strings from the Linux kernel in the firmware update are already > visible when running it through strings, but they have been modified to > not mention Linux. Are you sure it's really Linux for sure? I've noted that some strings can be quite common, so a few similar strings isn't definitive. I suggest anyway you mail your evidence over to me at <complia...@sfconservancy.org> and we'll look into it with you. It's better not to accuse a company publicly without at least investigating the facts in detail first and trying to talk to them privately first. > What would be the recommended way to address this situation? Report the GPL violation to someone able to enforce is the best advice. I'm willing to help. I look forward to your private email on it. -- bkuhn
