[Hold on here, didn't the Maoists state they were going to disrupt the elections
by any means neccessary? What gives?-- Macdonald]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2295541.stm

Rebels condemn Nepal poll delay

Nepalese policemen on Kathmandu street
Security is being cited as reason for postponing the polls
Sushil Sharma
BBC correspondent in Kathmandu

Maoist rebels in Nepal have condemned the government's move to defer
the November general elections.

Prime minister Sher Bahadur Deuba on Thursday asked king Gyanendra to
postpone the elections by a year due to security concerns caused by
the long-running Maoist insurgency.

But a top rebel leader has warned against such a move.

Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba
Prime Minister Deuba's move has the backing of major opposition groups

King Gyanendra has been engaged in political and legal consultations
over Prime Minister Deuba's recommendation.

He is expected to make a decision soon.

Major opposition parties including the United Marxist-Leninist
(UML)have backed the postponement of elections.

Some others including the Nepali Congress led by former Prime
Minister, Girija Prasad Koirala, have opposed it, saying that the
parliament which Prime Minister Deuba dissolved last June should be
restored.

The Maoist rebels appear to have thrown their weight behind the
supporters of the restoration of parliament.

Dialogue demanded

In a statement faxed to newspapers on Friday, the chairman of the
Maoist communist party, Prachanda, said that the restoration of
parliament ahead of a dialogue was the easy way out to resolve the
current crisis.

King Gyanendra
Any decision by the King is likely to be hotly debated

Mr Prachanda accused the government of conspiring against the
prospects of a negotiated solution.

He said that the government wanted to escalate the long-running
conflict by deferring the elections and forming a coalition government.

He did not elaborate.

However, he did reiterate his oft-repeated offer to resume peace talks
for what he described as "a positive political solution".

The government, which launched a military offensive against the rebels
last year, had already rejected the offer, saying that the rebels were
not sincere enough.

The rebels unilaterally pulled out of a cease-fire and peace talks
last year after three rounds of inconclusive rounds before resuming
attacks on army barracks and police stations.

Constitutional powers

Under the Nepalese constitution, the caretaker prime minister's term
in office cannot exceed six months and he has limited powers in
restoring a dissolved parliament in the event of a delay in polls.

King Gyanendra has the prerogative to untangle this complex issue and
analysts say it is not clear which way he will go.

There has also been speculation that the King may seek to revive the
executive powers his late elder brother used to have.

Any formal announcement by King Gyanendra is certain to be hotly debated.

But analysts say the political future of Nepal is uncertain after it
witnessed a series of tragedies in recent years.
Background to Nepal's Maoist war



-------------------------------------------
Macdonald Stainsby
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international
--
In the contradiction lies the hope.
                                     --Bertholt Brecht



_______________________________________________
Leninist-International mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international

Reply via email to