Why don't you just use the calibrate_lens_gui.exe executable from the hugin suite.
I find the interface is very nice. You kind of have to read between the lines to figure out which parameters are which, but its still easier than installing and running python and modules. I wish there had been some documentation for this, method. It doesn't do vignetting but softwares don't support that anyway, and it would be better to use gray frame every time, because you can correct for dust on the sensor. Again not supported by any open source software. > On Nov 15, 2018, at 4:54 PM, jys <junkyardspar...@yepmail.net> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018, at 03:07, Andreas Schneider wrote: >> >> Currently it is developed here: >> >> https://gitlab.com/cryptomilk/lens_calibrate > > Only took a quick look so far, I like the self-explanatory ini file. This > line of the README seems not quite correct, though: > > * maker: is the manufacturer or the lens, e.g. 'FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM' > > The maker should be "Sony" or "Pentax" or whatever. :) > >> Attached is patch to add it to the lensfun repository if you prefer that. I >> would delete my repo then. As lensfun is GPLv3 I licensed the new script >> under >> the same license. > > It might make life easier for the maintainers of the lensfun packages for > various distros if it's maintained as its own project, given the deps and > possible development activity, just a thought. > >> Also I have written a completely new detailed tutorial for lens calibration. >> It is be ready to be released on https://pixls.us/ if that is OK. >> >> A copy of the article can be found here: >> >> https://hackmd.io/s/SkOIRlr5z > > I'll try to take a look at that and get the deps built on my new Slackware > box, I haven't gotten around to doing a decent scipy build, because it's a > little bit of a headache. Since it's only needed for vignetting, I hacked > that part out of the old script so I could still use it for distortion and > TCA; since this version appears to allow the user to call these operations > independently, maybe it could only require scipy if that operation is called? > This might make it easier for people who only want to do the other > corrections to use the script. > > In any case, thanks for your work! > > -- > jys > > > _______________________________________________ > Lensfun-users mailing list > Lensfun-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users _______________________________________________ Lensfun-users mailing list Lensfun-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users
