[ Just realised that I sent my response just to Martin, but to the list. Sorry about that. ]
Hi Martin, Sorry for the lack of activity on this. Github is the right place to put these (if you've already done the calibration then ideally make a PR, but an issue is also fine). I'll take a look at your data and try to get it merged shortly. (I've been away from the project for a bit with family and work commitments but I'm having a look at the backlog now). I have IT issues, but I hope that everything will be restored from backups by the weekend so I'll be looking into things next week. Torsten normally reviews data before it gets merged and I don't know what checks he would run. I'll make a PR and ask him to review. If anyone else is in a similar situation waiting, then firstly thanks for sending us the data. If it's in a PR on github then I'll get to it soon. If it's in an issue then I'll get to it, but if you convert it into a PR or send me the issue number then I'll get to it sooner. If you've sent things to the mailing list then please either put them on Github or respond them to the list so that they don't get lost in the archive. Thanks, Graeme On Sat, 27 Mar 2021, 20:09 Martin Kunz, <martin...@gmx.de> wrote: > Dear lensfun developers, > > Three months ago I provided profiles for said Tamron lenses in this > Github issue <https://github.com/lensfun/lensfun/issues/1332>. As far as > I can see, they are not included in the latest version of lensfun. Assuming > that putting them in a Github issue was the wrong strategy then, I am > attaching the profiles to this message with the request to add them to the > database. > > Cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Lensfun-users mailing list > Lensfun-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users >
_______________________________________________ Lensfun-users mailing list Lensfun-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users
