On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Terry Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A comment on the term "icon". Really to be clear we need to say > "user-icon" or "status-icon". The status icon being the > content/clone/dirty/marked indicator that Leo's had for much longer > than it's had user-icons. > > The rclickicon hook currently only runs off the status-icon, I don't > think any hooks use the user-icons. So bobjack's changes might make > things more flexible in that regard. > > I think the status-icon deserves a, um, special status, the information it > conveys is important, and bear in mind that other interfaces might convey it > in other ways. > > So maybe bobjack's high level container thing should have > status.marked, status.dirty, etc. attributes/methods, and while the Tk > interface uses an icon to show those, another interface might not. Let's wait until after 4.4.8 final to deal with this. In other words, until tomorrow :-) Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
