On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Terry Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:17:37 -0700 (PDT) > derwisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What about unknownAttributes of vnodes and tnodes? What will the > > distinction in future be? > > I think the way to retain the context distinctions you get from vnodes > will be through position dependent rendering of nodes. You might need > to inspect p.stack to work out the context the node is displayed in. I > don't think anything will be lost, vnodes were basically a display > context too. Possible, but then you have to remember stuff about positions, which seems like an heroic solution to something that shouldn't be a problem at all. I discussed this in detail in another thread. > It seems much more appropriate that "context" should come from > something transient and dynamic like a position (path) rather than > something relatively static like vnodes. I agree. > These unified nodes will simplify parts of cleo, or more specifically > parts of the user-icon drawing code. I glad to hear it. Imo, they will simplify *all* aspects of Leo, and lead users to more Leonine solutions. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
