@ (@doc) in html files produces bad html if there are already
<!-- comments --> in the area covered by @ because html/xml comments
don't nest.
... I guess this is a misuse of @, rather than a bug. I was trying to
use @ to mark a section as inactive.
How can I do that? I'm prepared to use a @file/@nosent type tree as
opposed to a @thin type tree (i.e. .leo file is canonical source for
document), but @ignore doesn't work for subtrees of a @file...
Wait, I take that back, @ignore does exactly what I want in a @nosent
file. So I'm happy, the absence of sentries isn't important to me in
this case, but if the .leo file is canonical source there's really no
reason for sentries in the derived file, so that's logical.
Bug report: ;-)
The @ignore docs. are broken:
---
@ignore
The @ignore directive is valid only in the root node of @file trees.
The @ignore directive has several uses:
* In the root node of an @file tree, @ignore prevents Leo from
writing the derived file.
* In @root trees, @ignore excludes the @ignore tree from the
derived file.
* Outside of @file and @root trees, @ignore can be used by scripts.
---
But @ignore appears to be valid and useful in subtrees of @nosent files.
Cheers -Terry
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
