On Sep 20, 6:03 am, "Edward K. Ream" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The point of all this is simply that worthy bugs demand solid proofs > that they have been solved. It's invalid simply to change code and > hope that it solves the problem. Indeed. __cmp__ isn't being called at all. __bool__ has no chance of being a replacement. I'll probably have to do __eq__ and __ne__ methods for positions. However, my hypothesis appears valid: terminating the loops using comparisons on head strings, while not valid in general, shows that the iterators are probably working correctly, while p == after isn't. This is good progress. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
