On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wonder if fewer things would break if children_iter() also ignored > nodes already seen unless an optional keyword argument was set True? > Maybe see whether that's needed or not when the time comes. I think changing children_iter is asking for trouble and confusion. Why change children_iter? There is no danger: it gives only the direct children. We don't children to go missing just because they are also back links, do we? Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
