On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:49:17 -0600 > "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote: > > to be absolutely correct I think that the index of the position (or is > it the vnode?) in the list of children needs to be the same. The above > seems to allow for the position to exist, but not in the same, um, > position. p._childIndex is not checked, in other words. Good catch. I'll fix this immediately. To answer your question, t.children contains vnodes, and child indices are indices of vnodes withing t.children, not indices of positions. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
