On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Right, and I think that's why the thread soon was about a db backend. > > But isn't that the purpose of Leo's zodb support? I do feel like we are > going around in circles. It may just be that the zodb support documentation requires a better "story". It's not clear how a *user* benefits from it, the documentation seems to be mostly about storing nodes to zodb from scripts: http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/zodb.html It is probably worth investigating how we can really start using zodb to maintain node information in user-accessible way, without the user having to write custom script code. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
