On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> How about a "act-on-node" command? > > > Many commands can act on a node, but the idea of designating one of > > them as the "node action" could open up even more possibilities. > > > > Rather than using events (hooks), uA's might be simpler. Plugins or > > scripts could create a uA called, say, designatedAction. Perhaps some > > (all?) nodes could have default designated actions. The value of the > > uA would be a script, and the act-on-node command would simply execute > > that script. > > Events hooks/callbacks are more flexible, in that they can do more > complex analysis of a node (including the parent hierarchy). I think you may be right. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
