On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Edward K. Ream <edream...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is a question of whether the importer should import the rST file > into an @rst tree, in such a way that writing that tree (with Leo's > write command, or with the rst plugin) would faithfully recreate the > original file. The problem with using Leo's write command is that the My opinion, FWIW: I don't mind if Leo "normalizes" or completely mangles the rst document (though extensive mangling should not be necessary). The important thing is that this should only happen once - that is, once leo has written out an rst document, reading it back in and writing out again should not cause changes in the document. Use case for this is publishing an rst document that is mostly edited with leo in version control system. Others may edit it without leo, and opening such a document with leo again can do some changes to the document, but not so much as to make investigating the version history messy. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
