On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Vicent<uve...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought they both had the same functionality (sorry for being so > ignorant). > In fact after the deprecation of the rst3 plugin I moved to @auto-rst > and use > it with the very same goal than I used the plugin: generate pdf > documentation > (via a self-made button). The main difference I noticed was that now > I > needn't export anything. Please, could you explain why they are > different?
Old-style @rst trees are still useful for people that wan't to *generate* files from leo trees. Some perks of what you get from @rst trees are cloneability and support for rst options, with the coest > > Vicent > > > -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
