>From Pep 20, the Zen of Python: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/
Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those! Imo, the valuespace plugin should support multiple valuespaces. At present there seems to be the potential for a lot of difficult-to-find mistakes, especially with multiple commanders open in the qttabs plugin. The idea is to make the following safe: @valuespace Experiment 41: compute the last digit of Pi. @valuespace Experiment 42: compute the answer to the ultimate question of... That is, we want to take valuespaces "seriously" by making them independent and suitable for important work. g.vs can remain, but is should be a dict whose values are valuespaces (or maybe commanders). The modified g.vs would allow "cross- valuespace" references (mechanism unspecified), but only explicitly. (Explicit is better than implicit.) Comments please. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
