On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Edward K. Ream <edream...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Possible. However, it assumes that c, g, and p mean what they mean in Leo. The worst that could happen in that case is that you get wrong completions, i.e. no harm done. You are not likely to get too confused as you'll immediately see that these are leo completions. > Perhaps the switch should be named something like eval_leo_symbols, > with the fallback to codewise completions as you suggest. I don't think we want a switch. It's a global option, and something users will not bother to toggle anyway. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
