On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM, mdb <[email protected]> wrote: >> Your comments please. > > I vote for using rst2pdf
Thanks for your vote. I'm leaning the same way. I think using standard tools wherever possible is a big improvements over hacks like leo_pdf.py. > This looks similar to using latexpdf > and the option to convert rst to latex as > another step remains possible > (to leverage latex's abilities) That option is always possible, regardless of whether leo_pdf.py exists or not. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
