No, not edges gone wild -- pointers: they don't really correlate with arrows between nodes . . . but sure, edges probably goes right into my Links level table. :-)
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Seth Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote: >> So your nodes table is essentially my EDGES table :) > > Ah! Will check that, but I think you're probably right. And your > nodes table would be more appropriately identified with my attributes > table(s). > > The "bottom level" for me is the individual attribute values. You > might call my entire structure "edges gone wild." I don't have > encapsulation at the node level. > > Maybe this will let me match it up with Leo format. Would be good to > see some sort of "certified" db representation of Leo, with code that > gets it in and out. > > > Seth -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
