On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
Sure,
[a widget] could be built, but that seems like so much re-invention of
the wheel.  Ok, so you get bold, italics, and font selection working,
and then someone wants a table editor.  Rich text editors have table
editors... where does it end?

I agree.

> 
Also, I'd make integration of Leo's key handling and other commands
with the rich text editor a low priority / down the road objective - I
think if people want a rich text editor, they want a rich text editor,
one that behaves like all the others they've used.

I agree.

Your remarks are consistent with the new thread, "Design questions re rich
text edit".  My present opinion is that adding rich text capabilities to
Leo will make it more complex without anything like a corresponding
benefit.  And it will distract the core developers from much more
interesting and important work.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to