I think we should have all the tickets in one place, i.e. github
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:24 PM, lewis <lewisn...@operamail.com> wrote: > +1 for github. It's working fine for me. > I tend towards leaving the old issues back on launchpad. > > Lewis > > > On Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:46:08 AM UTC+11, Matt Wilkie wrote: >> >> >> ~ issue migration is unecessary. Leave old stuff as old stuff and only >> create new bugs/requests as they arise, link backwards as needed. >> (Nunit<https://groups.google.com/d/topic/nunit-developer/m5IGh-u6cWI/discussion> >> ) >> ---- >> >> My personal opinion is that we should use all of GitHub's facilities: >> code, issues, wiki, and perhaps even github pages for leoeditor.com. >> Leo's internet presence is rather fractured and this is a good opportunity >> to pull everything together into a more cohesive and integrated whole. >> >> I'd give the github-issue-importer a trial run or two. If it works out of >> the box, great, otherwise proceed with "leave old stuff as old stuff". >> >> My 2c. >> >> -matt >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
