PIP is routinely used with python 2 - in fact a lot of modules in PyPI is
Python 2 only.

You can get it here: https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/installing.html

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Edward K. Ream <edream...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 9:31:32 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Ville M. Vainio <vivai...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW, I'm pretty pessimistic about Python 3 at this point. Python 2
>>> seems to be "good enough" for most people.
>>>
>>
>> ​I am not real optimistic about Python 3 myself.  ​
>>
>> ​As Kent says, more and more packages are being ported.  But Guido has
>> recently promised to support Python 2K until at least 2020 (a change from
>> 2015).  This indicates that all is not going well.
>>
>> My guess is that there are some big Python 2K shops that still have no
>> real notion about how they are going to transition to 3K.  It doesn't
>> matter how many people *have* made the transition as long as there are
>> important players who haven't or can't.
>>
>
> This is a complex topic.  Here are some further thoughts:
>
> Guido himself clearly believed (and probably still believes) that Python 2
> is *not* good enough.
>
> Otoh, Guido's remarks in recent PyCon keynote speeches indicate that he
> will never again attempt such a radical break with existing code.  He seems
> somewhat unhappy with the transition to Python 3.  That may be an
> understatement. Or not.  He has reasons to put a brave face on things.
>
> Kent's remark that more and more packages are being ported to Python 3 is
> more important than I originally acknowledged.  The available packages, not
> the problems of big shops, are what most people care about, or should care
> about.
>
> In some ways, the big shops don't matter all that much.  They can "take
> care of themselves" and they can always stick with Python 2.7.  When (not
> if) Python 2.7 is no longer supported, big shops can start paying the price
> that the core Python developers are now paying in supporting the Python 2
> code base.
>
> Finally, there are a growing list of reasons why Python 3 is simply better
> than Python 2.  I actually would *not* say that Python 3's support for
> unicode is one of those reasons, but that's debatable.  What is not
> debatable is that Python 3 has cool new features and modules that Python
> 2.8 will *never* have:
>
> - My favorite is pip install, the killer feature of Python 3.4.
>
> Yesterday I did "pip install ipython[all]" and everything Just
> Worked(tm).  This is the first time I have *ever* managed to install
> tornado on Windows, and thus the first time that "ipython notebook" has
> ever worked on windows.
>
> - The important asyncio module
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio.html is Python 3 only.
>
> Yes, there is a backport to Python 2:
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/trollius
>
> - Function annotations, https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3107/, will
> never be part of Python 2 unless they are supported in Python 2.8.
>
> - Similarly, the "yield from" syntax, pep 380,
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0380/, will never be part of Python 2.
>
> You can quibble about how important these features are (except, pip :-),
> but there is no doubt that Python 2 is a dead end.
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to