I am using Leo again to edit large collections of .tex files, and use at_others inside at_clean, which works fine as long as there are no \input command in the .tex file. When there is such an \input command, the corresponding file needs currently to be treated outside the tree.
An at_clean node as a child of a node with at_others will simply be treated like all other subnodes: its content will get placed after the at_others directive, but that is not what I want. The parent at_clean node should ignore the child at_clean node. Instead, I wish the child at_clean node would just do the usual thing, even when it is a child node of an at_clean tree. That way I could place the child at_clean node under the node where the \input command sits, and it would fit well into the overall hierarchy. What I just suggested for the at_clean node should of course go for all types of nodes where at_others is allowed. - Josef -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
